Series Story
Till how many terms can you carry on the following series:
The series starts with A3, B1, C1, continues with G2, H2, J2, K2, and so on . . .?
The series starts with A3, B1, C1, continues with G2, H2, J2, K2, and so on . . .?
Labels: logic
posted by ToM at
8:22 AM
14 Comments:
Is the question right? I can't see any patterns in the series.
This super easy.
I can carry on any series, no matter how many terms given.
There's one catch.... they probably may not match what you considered "the desired series".
an edit, but not trashed.
There's one catch.... they may not match what you considered "the desired series".
I don't get it either. You got another bone for us, Ragknot, please?
This post has been removed by the author.
Hi Ragknot. Is your sneaky trick along the lines, just repeat what's given over and over (i.e. a cyclic series)? If so, any given can be continued indefinitely. Nice :)
continue this series....
A3, B1, C1,....... G2, H2, J2, K2, . . .
with this
B#, C!, D!,....... H@, J@, K@, L@.......
In case someone did not catch my drift, let me know and I'll snow you again.
Hi Ragknot, you certainly snowed me :) Problem that leaves is we are being asked to find how many terms are there to go - if I've understood your last response (I probably haven't) the number of terms is a function of how many printable characters there are - and that may be open to debate. In which case the question isn't very good. As usual, I'm optimistic that the question is a "proper" one and not to do with some song lyrics that I've never heard of etc. Put that another way, if my last answer was wrong, I haven't a clue.
It doesn't look like the periodic table in code - I wonder if that's the kind of approach needed. Thanks for, um, er, whatever you said ;)
I've just read the first line of the question again, my answer is absolutely none at all :)
When the question is illogical, what's wrong with an illogical answer?
Prehaps the question was logical, but to me, I think my answer stiil fits.
There was no proper question presented, so there could not be a proper response.
This post has been removed by the author.
Hi Ragknot. My last wasn't a response to your last post. I've decided to assume that the question is correct and logical (especicially as it's labelled "logic" alone). I hope you didn't interpret my response as that you're answer was wrong - although I now suspect that, but that's only because of what I fancied I noticed. Right or wrong I enjoy your answers, and I'm quite sure you deliberately publish joke answers, I don't always know which is which though (as you intended).
I deleted my 2:16 PM post, as it was the most idiotic thing I've published in my entire life.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home