Monday, December 28, 2009

Inscribed Polygons

Imagine a circle with a radius of one unit. Inside the circle, inscribe the largest possible equilateral triangle. In the triangle, inscribe a circle. In the circle goes a square ... in the square a circle...in the circle a regular pentagon ... in the pentagon a circle ... etc. Each consecutive polygon has one more side ... alternating with circles. The circles get smaller and smaller.

Can you make a rough guess as to how small the circle will eventually become?

Labels:

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Inscribed Polygons
Inscribe polygons on the circle have their corners touch the outer circle
the inner circle touches the sides of each polygon

Call the outer circle Radius Ro
So in the case of the triangle the distance from the center to each corner is R
The distance from the centre to the centre of each edge is R_3=Ro*cos(60)
R3 is the radius of the circle inside the triangle

So in the case of the square the distance from the center to each corner is R3
The distance from the centre to the centre of each edge is R[4]=R[3]*cos(45)
R4 is the radius of the circle inside the square

So in the case of the pentagon the distance from the center to each corner is R4
The distance from the centre to the centre of each edge is R[5]=R[4]*cos(36)
R5 is the radius of the circle inside the pentagon

So in the case of the n-sided shape the distance from the center to each corner is Rn-1
The distance from the centre to the centre of each edge is R[n]=R[n-1]*cos(180/n)
e.g. R[175]=R[174]*cos(180/175)
Rn is the radius of the circle inside the pentagon

R[n]=Ro*cos(180/3)*cos(180/4)*cos(180/5)*......*cos(180/(n-1))*cos(180/n)

as n-> inf (cos 180/n)=1
Not entirely sure about how to evaluate the series as n-> inf
P=cos(180/3)*cos(180/4)*cos(180/5)*......*cos(180/(n-1))*cos(180/n)
So I ended up using some brute force techniques (program that kept evaluating series until the change in P was sufficiently small). It appears to approach 0.114974

So R as n->inf = Ro*P=1*0.114974
Answer:
R=0.114974

Hopefully no mistakes above. Not exactly happy with evaluating the series using brute force. I may try to evaluate it for an exact solution at a later date.

Cam

December 28, 2009 9:23 PM  
Anonymous Zaux said...

Wow ... right again Cam ... what have I go to do to find a puzzle which stumps you? Nice work man!

December 28, 2009 9:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks Zaux,

Just as a side note:
I reevaluated R with some more iterations and it appears to be a bit closer to 0.114942

Cam

December 28, 2009 10:04 PM  
Anonymous Zaux said...

Hi cam ... got a problem for you.
Prove the Riemann Hypothesis! Maybe that will take a little longer! ... heh heh.

December 28, 2009 10:13 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Best I've found is:
0.11494204485329620070104015746959874283079533720086

December 29, 2009 2:44 AM  
Blogger Chris said...

As far as I can determine, there is no exact expression for the infinite product. Mathematica didn't offer one, and the internet only came up with probable noes.

December 29, 2009 4:11 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home