Friday, February 5, 2010

Back to your roots

Evaluate rt(1 + rt(7 + rt( 1 + rt(7+......)))), where rt means square root. I have designed this so that the answer is an integer.

Labels:

14 Comments:

Blogger Knightmare said...

Chris...i can delete my own comments easy enough,but can't delete others(like yours in the last post-as you wanted me to)

how?

February 5, 2010 8:23 PM  
Anonymous Jon said...

2

February 5, 2010 8:43 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Knightmare. You have to do it from the comments editor; just scroll to it in that window - you should see a dustbin by every post. Sorry, I had forgotten that.

February 5, 2010 8:56 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Jon. 2 it is. How did you solve it?

February 5, 2010 8:57 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Knightmare. I just completely removed your deleted post. Tee hee.

February 5, 2010 9:25 PM  
Blogger Knightmare said...

Chris...i've got a grip on my super powers now.

behold and bewarned...i too,wield the forces of the invincible blog author.haahhhhahaaaaa(evil laugh)

February 5, 2010 9:38 PM  
Blogger Knightmare said...

but i still have to kick!

February 5, 2010 9:41 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

.. but you can delete the kicks completely and keep the page tidy. You'll also notice that the posts end up in the comment window, even if they haven't flushed trough to the main page.

February 5, 2010 9:46 PM  
Blogger Knightmare said...

so what you are saying is that with great power comes great responsibility

February 5, 2010 10:13 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Oh yes! I hope you can withstand the strain of it. Pequod will be buckling (even more than usual) under the load. May the force be with her.

February 5, 2010 10:22 PM  
Blogger Knightmare said...

Chris...LOL

February 5, 2010 10:32 PM  
Blogger RiDiM said...

Without calculation i can tell it has to be "2". Analytical reasoning that is!

February 6, 2010 1:06 AM  
Blogger Vago said...

oookkk.... leaving aside the super powers you have got (be warned people, i have them to!! muhahahahaha)

the question's solution:
let x = rt(1 + rt(7 + rt( 1 + rt(7+......))))
then, x = rt(1 + rt(7 + x)
PS: since x is an infinite series
=> x^2 = 1 + rt(7+x)
=> x^2 - 1 = rt(7+x)

solving gives that x = 2. I don't have enough time to do it manually, so i used a program :P

btw, Chris, thanks for the prep about cube roots of unity. We did it yesterday, and i'm guessing I was the only one who understood it (cuz of your explanation, and a little of my own research after that).

PS: just a note, i won't be able to come to ToM for about... umm... till April 2nd week or so 0o. so, cya later (... a looooong while later)

February 6, 2010 1:14 AM  
Blogger Chris said...

Let x = rt(1 + rt(7 + rt( 1 + rt(7+......
See that x = rt(1 +rt(7 + x))

You can at this point try trial and error. In fact if you try
any initial x ≥ -7, then calculate rt(1 +rt(7 + x)), you'll get a
number that is closer to 2. Pop that back in again, over and over
again, you quickly see that you get closer and closer to 2. If you
put 2 in, you get 2 out.

x² - 1 = rt(7 + x) => (x² - 1)² = 7 + x => x^4 - 2x² - x - 6 = 0.
If you take advantage of the insight that x = 2 is a root, then
you may write (x-2)(x³ + 2x² +2x +3). However, numerical methods
are about the only practical way to solve the initial quartic.
Go to www.wolframalpha.com and enter NSolve[x^4 -2x² -x -6 == 0]
You'll get 4 roots: -1.8105, -0.09473 + (+/-) i 1.28374 and 2.
However, whichever of these values you plug in, you get an output
that is closer to 2.

Bit of a rubbish problem. Handling quartics isn't particularly
easy (without a computer). I probably had more fun choosng
a and b such that x = rt(a + rt(b + x)) = 2

February 6, 2010 7:08 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home