Subscribe via feed.

## Kids ages

Posted by Chris on January 17, 2014 – 11:55 pm

I have four children. Their ages (a whole number of years) are between 2 and 16 inclusive. No two have the same age. Last year, the square of the age of the oldest was the same as the sum of the squares of the ages of the other three. Next year the sum of the squares of the oldest and the youngest will be the same as the sum of the squares of the ages of the other two.

What are the possible ages of my children?

This post is under “MathsChallenge” and has 33 respond so far.
If you enjoy this article, make sure you subscribe to my RSS Feed.

### 33 Responds so far- Add one»

1. 1. slavy Said：

Nice problem, I like it If 16 is included, then we have 2 possibilities. If not – only one.

2. 2. Chris Said：

Just for you Slavy, what age is need to get three solutions.

The first part of the original question was whether or not the info given gave a unique solution.

Needless to say it’s dead easy to do on a computer.

3. 3. slavy Said：

If I’m not mistaken 31

4. 4. Chris Said：

You’re not mistaken.

Does mod 8 pretty well crack this one?

5. 5. slavy Said：

You may not use any modulo arithmetic, but I did use mod 8 (actually mod 4) in the first step of the proof. There are several tricks involved in the problem, that’s why I like it If you don’t know how to start and need some hints – the age of the youngest is uniquely determined from the statements in the problem. Find it and if you still don’t know how to proceed – let me know

6. 6. slavy Said：

I interpret the silence as people are stuck with the problem, so let me start with the first hint: Prove that the youngest is of odd age!

7. 7. DP Said：

I just read this problem this morning. I was about to write out what I know…

2 ≤ a < b < c < d ≤ 16

(a-1)^2 + (b-1)^2 + (c-1)^2 = (d-1)^2

(a+1)^2 + (d+1)^2 = (b+1)^2 + (c+1)^2

a, b, c, d must either be: all odd, all even, or two of each.

8. 8. DP Said：

To start finding an acceptable range of each value:

From my second equation, the term (a-1) must be less than the square root of one-third of (d-1)^2: (a-1) ≤ sqrt[(d-1)^2 / 3]
and if d=16 (maximum), then (a-1) ≤ sqrt[15^2 / 3]
=> a ≤ 9.66
So a is an integer from 2 to 9 (inclusive).

From that same equation we see that (d-1)^2 must be at least the sum of the squares of (a-1), (b-1), and (c-1) where a=2, b=3, and c=4. That gives us that d muse be at least 3.74, so d must be at least 4.
However, we already know that d must be at least 5, since no 2 ages are the same (minimum: a=2, b=3, c=4, d=5).
So d is an integer from 5 to 16 (inclusive).

That doesn’t get me much closer to the answer, but if someone were to do this brute-force, then there is no need to look past a=9.

9. 9. slavy Said：

Hi DP. They can’t be all even, because the first equality fails mod 4 (or mod 8 whatever you prefer).

10. 10. slavy Said：

Also with more intelligent approach (namely playing with the two equations and combining them in a smart way) you’ll get a<6.

11. 11. DP Said：

By the way, I never gave my answers – only some analysis. I came up with 2 solutions to the problem, as slavy has already pointed out.
The two possibilities are: (3,6,15,16) -or- (3,7,10,12).

12. 12. Chris Said：

Hi. Slavy. I’ve been playing games instead of doing maths. I know from your comment (a < 6 and that a is odd – so a is 3 or 5) and your statement about combining the equations, that we both made the same move.

Subtracting the two equations => 4d = 4c + 4b – 2(a^2 + 1)
So it’s immediately apparent (mod 4) that a^2 + 1 is even, so a is odd.
Dividing by 4 and rearranging => b + c = d + (a^2 + 1)/2

Using d > c > b > a suggests b = a +1 +B, c = a +2 +B +C, d = a +3 +B +C + D,
where B,C,D are all ≥ 0.
So 2a + 3 + 2B + C = a + 3 + B + C + D + (a^2 + 1)/2
=> a + B = D + (a^2 + 1)/2 => B = D + (a – 1)^2 /2
a = 3 => B = D + 2, so B & ge; 2 => b ≥ 6, c ≥ 7, d ≥ 8. No problem so far.
a = 5 => B = D + 8 => B ≥ 8 => b ≥ 14 and c ≥ 15, d ≥16.
That’s at the limit for d. Substituting a = 3, b = 14, c = 15, d = 16 doesn’t satisfy the equations. I don’t like that last step, it wasn’t clever and gives me no insight as to why allowing the eldest to be 31 does make a = 5 be allowed. Then we get a = 5, b = 21, c = 23, d = 31 (found with a computer).

So a = 3. I won’t say “if a solution exists” because I already know there are two of them, and DP has posted them.

That’s as far as I’ve got. I now have to scratch my head about the next move (and also on how to improve that last cheat).

13. 13. Chris Said：

Here’s the mod 4 and mod 8 trickery.
Let n = 2m, then n^2 = 4m^2 = 0 (mod 4).
Let n = 2m + 1, then n^2 = 4m^2 + 4m + 1 = 1 (mod 4).
So n^2 = 0 (mod 4) if n is even, and n^2 = 1 (mod 4) if n is odd.

If 2 or 3 of x, y, z are odd, then x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 2 or 3 (mod 4) and so cannot be a square. So, if w^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2, then, at most, 1 of x,y,z can be odd.

We have (d-1)^2 = (c-1)^2 + (b-1)^2 + (a-1)^2. So, at most, one of a,b,c can be even and then d is even.

w^2 + z^2 = x^2 + y^2 doesn’t yield anything interesting (mod 4). It does yield some extra info mod 8.

For reference. n^2 = 1 (mod 8 ) if n is odd. n^2 = 4 (mod 8 ) if n is divisible by 2, but not 4, n^2 = 0 (mod 8 ) if n is divisible by 4.
Proof: n = 4m => n^2 = 16m^2 = 0 (mod 8 )
n = 2(2m+1) => n^2 = 16m^2 + 8m + 4 = 4 (mod 8 )
n = 2m + 1 => n^2 = 4m^2 + 4m + 1 = 4m(m+1) + 1. Now either m or m+1 is even so 4m(m+1) is divisible by 8 => n^2 = 1 (mod 8 )

14. 14. Chris Said：

Off topic, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange’s_four-square_theorem as is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_theorem_on_sums_of_two_squares .

15. 15. slavy Said：

HI Chris. Yes, that’s what I have in mind. I personally prefer to write the equation in the form 2(d-c)=2b-(a^2+1). The LHS is positive, thus so is the RHS, meaning that a^2+1 < 2b. b is lest or equal to 14, so a is less or equal to 5 (and odd). If we assume it's 5, then b should be 14, and c=15, d=16. Direct check shows this cannot happen. Thus a=3, and d= b+c-5. Now, you just need to find a simplified enough Diophantine equation for b and c to solve. Let me know what your choice is

16. 16. Chris Said：

Hi Slavy. Aaargh, I wish I’d seen that “shortcut”. I knew I was goofing up when I introduced B,C and D.

Here are all the solutions when for the indicated age of the youngest
3 6 15 16
3 7 10 12
5 14 93 94
5 15 53 55
5 17 33 37
5 18 29 34
5 21 23 31
7 26 331 332
7 27 178 180
7 28 127 130
7 31 76 82
7 34 59 68
7 42 43 60
9 42 873 874
9 43 457 459
9 45 249 253
9 49 145 153
9 54 105 118
9 57 93 109
9 67 73 99
11 62 1911 1912
11 63 986 988
11 66 431 436
11 71 246 256
11 86 135 160
11 98 111 148

There are 22 cases for 13, here’s a few
13 86 3685 3686 (that’s the biggest)
13 121 185 221
13 125 175 215
13 130 165 210
13 133 160 208
13 135 157 207

(d-1)^2 = (c-1)^2 + (b-1)^2 + (a-1)^2
(d+1)^2= (c+1)^2 + (b+1)^2 – (a+1)^2

Here’s a couple of identities.
(x+1)^2 + (x-1)^2 = 2(x^2 +1) and (x+1)^2 – (x-1)^2 = 4x

Subtracting the original equations =>
4d = 4c + 4b – 2(a^2 + 1) => d = c + b – (a^2 + 1)/2 and a is odd. I’ve already dealt with that, so I’ll move on.

Summing the original equations =>
2(d^2 + 1) = 2(c^2 + 1) + 2(b^2 + 1) – 4a => d^2 = c^2 + b^2 – (2a – 1)
a is odd, so let a = 2q + 1 => 2a – 1 = 4q + 1. Substitute and re-arrange =>
d^2 + (4q + 1) = c^2 + b^2

If q is even, then a = 5,9,13,17,… and d^2 + 1 = c^2 + b^2 (mod 8 ) => one of b or c is simply odd, the other and d are either both odd or are both even and differ by a multiple of 4. That’s why 5 won’t work – in a previous post I showed that 5,14,15,16 was a candidate. 14 and 16 are even, but don’t differ by a multiple of 4.

If q is odd, then a = 3,7,11,15,… and d^2 = c^2 + b^2 + 3 (mod 8 ) => one of b or c is simply odd, and the other is even and differs from d by an odd multiple of 2.

I don’t know how to go further. So Mr. Slavy, pretty please, can I have some hints.

17. 17. DP Said：

Chris, you can delete this post.

Check your signs on eq #2. The b-term should be positive. The resulting math is correct with this modification.

18. 18. Chris Said：

Hi Slavy. Skip the hints for now, unless there is something totally different from any of the above. I realise that I haven’t fully explored d = b + c – 5.

19. 19. Chris Said：

Thanks DP. My proof-reading obviously isn’t up to scratch. I’ve fixed it.

20. 20. Chris Said：

I’ve also corrected the last two maths paragraphs.

I’ll delete this noise when I think they are fully superfluous.

I suspect that by combining d = b + c -5 with the parity rules, that a short list of candidate solutions can be made. But it may be that there are so many possibilities, that number crunching is still required, albeit more guided.

21. 21. Chris Said：

We have d = b + c – (a^2 + 1)/2 and also d^2 = c^2 + b^2 – (2a – 1). We know a = 3, so they become d = c + b – 5 and d^2 = c^2 + b^2 – 5. Substituting the first into the second => bc – 5(b+c) +15 = 0. So bc = 0 (mod 5). Yeehah.

I’ll be back…

22. 22. Chris Said：

…meanwhile: using a = 2q+1 is odd, the general Diophantine equation is
1 – b – c + bc + (4 – 2b – 2c)q(1 + q) + 4q^3 + 2q^4 = 0

23. 23. slavy Said：

Good job, Chris! This is the equation I used and I believe it’s the simplest one

24. 24. Chris Said：

Using a = 2q+1 is odd, the general version of the Diophantine equation is
1 – (b +c) + bc + 2(2 – (b + c))q(1 + q) + 4q^3 + 2q^4 = 0
q = 1 (a = 3) => 1 – b – c + bc + (4 – 2b – 2c)2 + 4 + 2 = 0
=> bc – 5(b +c) + 15 = 0 => bc = 0 (mod 5)

q = 2 (a = 5) => bc – 13( b + c) + 89 = 0 => bc = 2 (mod 13)
and bc = 13(b+c) (mod 89)

q = 3 (a = 7) => bc – 25(b+c) + 319 = 0
q = 4 (a = 9) => bc – 41(b+c) + 849 = 0
q = 5 (a = 11) => bc -61(b+c) + 1871 = 0
q = 6 (a = 13) => bc – 85(b+c) + 3625 = 0
etc.

These Diophantine equations require no arm-waving or further rules to augment them. The solution set is finite in all cases that I’ve tested. The only restraint is that we artificially constrain solutions to 16 ≥ d > c > b > a ≥ 2. If I removed all constraints, some negative ages creep in, and b and c are interchangeable. Of course a is automatically constrained due to the way we developed the equation (and that we choose q, rather than calculate it).

I have improved the table in post 16. I’ve left the upper age as infinity in that table.

25. 25. Chris Said：

Hi Slavy. Guess what, another Olympiad problem. Looks easy, but isn’t.

I only know that the Diophantine equation is all that is needed because, I plugged it into Mathemtica (which also did a lot of the donkey work). It was able to furnish all the solutions I’d found. The only extra ones were because I’d limited the maximum age in my computer program.

I now want to see if I can solve any of those equations. bc =0 (mod 5) isn’t really a solution, but it fitted the known data.

26. 26. Chris Said：

The Diophantine equation is probably better written as
bc – (b + c)(1 + 2q + 2q^2) + (1 + 4q + 4q^2 + 4q^3 + 2q^4) = 0

For completeness, a = 2q + 1 and d = b + c – (1 +2q + 2q^2)

27. 27. Chris Said：

I’ve made some progress on solving bc – 5(b + c) + 15 = 0. But I’m not done with it yet.

I haven’t looked at bc – 13(b + c) + 89 = 0 at all. I’m amazed how easily Slavy takes all this stuff in his stride.

EDIT: 10 mins after posting this, I had a flash of inspiration. It uses a trick that’s been used here recently. I haven’t tested it out yet.

28. 28. Chris Said：

bc – 5(b+c) + 15 = 0 => (b – 5)(c – 5) = 10. Now 10 = 1 * 10 = 2 * 5. Noting that the expression is symmetric in b and c, WLOG either b – 5 = 1 and c – 5 = 10 or b – 5 = 2 and c – 5 = 5. In the first case b = 6 and c = 15, and in the second case b = 7 and c = 10.

If we also note that 10 = (-1)(-10) = (-2)(-5). In the first case we get b = 4 and c = -5. In the second case we get b = 3 and c = 0. These aren’t admissable for the kids ages. It is also clear that there are no other conceivable solutions. We also get that lot again but with b and c in reverse roles.

If q = 2 (=> a = 5) then we have bc – 13(b + c) + 89 = 0 =>
(b – 13)(c – 13) = 1*80 = 2*40 = 4*20 = 8*10 = 16*5. That’s 5 basic factor pair. Now double that because of the negative versions, and double again because we can write those factors in the reverse order, that’s 20 solutions. OTOH the equation is symmetric in b and c and we only allow positive integer solutions, we finally end up with 5 acceptable solutions. They require that the eldest is up to 94 years of age.

29. 29. Chris Said：

Now I’ve seen the solution and how easy it is, I see that everything Slavy said was spot on and I shouldn’t have wasted all that effort on parity-checking the equations.

Re-write the Diophantine equation in the very convenient form:
(b – (1 + 2q + 2q^2))(c – (1 + 2q + 2q^2)) = 2q^2 (2 + 2q + q^2)

a = 2q + 1 and d = b + c – (1 +2q + 2q^2) completes the scene.

In the following the ± are always both + or both -. In the worst csase we have
(b – k)(c – k) = 2p, p prime, then beause 2p = (±1)(±2p) = (±2)(±p) the solutions are of the form b = k ± 1, c = k ± 2p and b = k ± 2, c = k ± p and double that if take b and c to be distinct.

I enjoyed doing this problem. But that’s enough from me (for now).

Later: Just me being tedious,
Let k = 1 + 2q + 2q^2 and r = 2q^2(1 +2q + 2q^2), then the Diophantine equation is (b – k)(c – k) = r.
a = 2q + 1 and d = b + c – k completes the problem.

q may be negative.

30. 30. Chris Said：

Aaargh. I’ve made a boo-boo somewhere. The RHS of the equation has at least three factors. Ho, hum!

31. 31. slavy Said：

I’m glad to see you’ve made it Chris Last post from mi side, too: The fastest way to solve a Diophantine equation is to express one of the variables as a function of the other and to use that the solution should be integral. For a=3, we have c=(5b-15)/(b-5)=5+10/(b-5) and since c is larger, b can be only 6 or 7. For a=5 we have c=13+80/(b-13). Now, since d=b+c-10, the latter is smallest when b+c is minimal, which in turn happens when the two ages are as close to each other as possible. Thus b-13=8 and c-13=10 leading to d=31. The formulas are basically the same as the one Chris produced, just the “focus” is a little bit changed and this is mainly what I wanted to comment on

32. 32. Chris Said：

Thank you Slavy. I agree that your integer solution technique has got a definite edge to it (it’s definitely more natural). I’d forgotten to do the analysis for the maximum age, so thanks for adding it.

Those links in post 14 led me to consider Goldbach’s conjecture and also some sweet stuff to do with Gaussian integers.

Altogether this has been excellent experience.

33. 33. Chris Said：

Last comment (or maybe not). The equations I gave in post 24 are more neatly written as

q = 1 => a = 3, (b – 5)(c – 5) = 10, d = b + c – 5
q = 2 => a = 5, (b – 13)( c -13) = 80, d = b + c – 13
q = 3 => a = 7, (b – 25)(c – 25) = 306, d = b + c – 25
q = 4 => a = 9, (b – 41)(c – 41) = 832, d = b + c – 41
q = 5 => a = 11, (b – 61)(c – 61) = 1850, d = b + c – 61
q = 6 => a = 13, (b – 85)(c – 85) = 3600, d = b + c – 85

PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Parallels\Plesk\Additional\PleskPHP5\ext\php_mssql.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Parallels\Plesk\Additional\PleskPHP5\ext\php_pdo_mssql.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0